Sunday Bonus Article!
Readers, it’s easy to get caught up in the horse race of Kamala versus The Donald, even when neither is exactly a thoroughbred. It’s the only horse race for president that we have, and it’s constantly hyped by the press as “too close to call.” Of course, it matters who wins, to a certain extent, and on certain issues, but whether Kamala or The Donald is first past the post, the rat race for power in DC won’t change. (With apologies to horses and rats.)
Back in 2022, I wrote about a book that had a major impact on me when I first read it in 1988. It’s Hedrick Smith’s “The Power Game.” In the 35+ years since he wrote it, America has been further bled by the powerbrokers, so much so that democracy in America is a corpse that probably cannot be reanimated.
Anyhow, as the media encourages us to vote (but only for the Red and Blue Teams), it’s a worthwhile exercise to recall that if voting truly mattered in America (in the sense of substantial change for workers and powerless), the powerful would have already made it illegal. That, of course, was the sentiment of radical leftist Emma Goldman, so they deported her ass back to Russia. Because democracy!
The Power Game
JUL 09, 2022
A book that shook my world was journalist Hedrick Smith's "The Power Game," published 35 years ago in 1987. It was about "How Washington really works," and what I remember about it is how it made me feel, as in discouraged and outraged. I learned about the power of lobbyists, the power of money, and what money gains you, which is access. More-or-less legal forms of corruption in 1987 are now most definitely legal, with the Supreme Court decreeing that corporations are citizens and that money is speech. It's amazing how the law can be twisted to serve the interests of the powerful. I for one do not believe that Raytheon and I are both equal citizens and that we both have equivalent access to elected representatives through our "speech," i.e. our money. But the Supreme Court professes to believe this so there you have it.
When you look at who runs America, it's a fairly short list. Wall Street, Big Pharma, the fossil fuel companies, Big Tech and Silicon Valley, the military-industrial complex (National Security State), the major banks and insurance companies: any "citizen" with access to billions of dollars who can then buy or rent politicians with millions of dollars. It's a great deal for them, "investing" in politicians, making them dance to their tune, but it's a lousy deal for the rest of us.
This makes me think of one of my father's favorite sayings: He who pays the piper calls the tune. If I toss a penny and ask for a tune, and another "citizen" tosses twenty bucks and asks for a different one, I'm not surprised when the piper doesn't play my tune. So when the Princeton Study said that the U.S. is an oligarchy and that politicians in Washington don't listen to us, I wasn't surprised. I learned it from Hedrick Smith in 1988 when I read his book.
Interestingly, when Smith wrote "The Power Game," America had just over 4000 political action committees, or PACs. In 2014, America had well over 7000 PACs, including "Super" PACs, which have far fewer constraints in how they can use their money in the political realm. Now we even have "dark" money, and so we're barraged by ads on TV and elsewhere attacking a candidate or an issue without any clear idea of who's behind it all and why. But, remember, money is speech and corporations are citizens, so let the good times roll in the U.S. political process.
When Hedrick Smith wrote, things weren't quite as bad in America. There were more newspapers, more media sources, more real journalists. Nowadays, five or six corporations own all the mainstream media outlets, and it's not in their interest to promote views that are honest and provocative. Indeed, they love PACs and Super PACs and all the money spent by them and political campaigns to influence voting.
It's gotten to be so corrupt, and so tightly controlled, as in rigged, that it almost doesn't matter who runs for office. Clearly, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris aren't driving policy in America. The few decisions they themselves truly make are almost inconsequential.
One thing I really liked about Hedrick Smith is his honesty. He gave a talk on his book, link here:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?3754-1/power-game-washington-works
Where he explained that, if you're a politician and you accept certain campaign donations, it's understood between both parties that when the donor needs you to vote a certain way, you will vote that way, no questions asked. Everyone in Congress understands this. It's why every effort by real citizens to get big money out of politics fails. It fails because the big donors won't have it. They like to be able to buy politicians, thank you very much. That's how democracy works, so says the Supreme Court. If you don't like it, start your own corporation, make a few billion, then you too can buy your own politician.
A revival of democracy in America starts with campaign finance reform, which most politicians say they're for even as they vote against it. Sounds like a conundrum to me. Can we solve it by explaining to our esteemed justices (John Roberts, can you hear me?) that money is not the same as speech and that corporations really aren't the same as citizens?
Finally, a rather obvious point, but it bears repeating. Justices like Thomas, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett weren't just selected because they were reliable votes against abortion. They were really vetted and selected because they will always rule with the powerful against the powerless. They are, in a word, pro-corporate.
And if the Supreme Court is pro-corporate, if Congress is pro-corporate, and if the president is a figurehead known for his pro-corporate policies as a Senator from Delaware, what kind of America are we truly looking at?
In the power game that is Washington, it's the American people who suffer the agony of defeat.
Well said! Even when we get a 'somewhat' Populist running, they are one against The Machine.
But, I'm an optimist, so I think if you can hurt Democracy you can save it as well. It's certainly worth a try.
A major difference between then and now is that the billionaires have a LOT more money now than they did then, and they now have full control over the CON "news". They did not have as much control back then as they do now. I have a hypothesis that the ultra rich have decided that now is the best chance they have ever had to finish the job, and completely capture all of the government and military and make them work exclusively for the billionaire class. All of the wars now are about resource control and keeping potential competitors beaten down. It is why they blew up the Nordstream pipelines, to make sure that Germany and Russia never formed a lasting partnership. They didn't blow up the pipeline because generals in the military told them to, they did it because the RAND corporation said it would help further divide Russia from Germany and keep competition down. So far, it has worked perfectly, but that may not last.
We are never going to fix things until we fix the problem of unregulated, unlimited capitalism (or according to Jeff, unlimited corporatism).