America Is Weak!
Spend More on the Military! Says the New York Times
As the U.S. deploys more troops to the Middle East (now nearing 50,000 and rising), as Israel expands its war into Lebanon by killing nearly 500 people there, as Palestinians continue to die in Gaza and the West Bank as Israel steals their land, the “liberal” New York Times is running features on how “weak” the U.S. military is.
This is from yesterday’s New York Times send-out, citing a recent (and typical) bipartisan study:
*******
American weaknesses
The report cited several major U.S. weaknesses, including:
A failure to remain ahead of China in some aspects of military power. “China is outpacing the United States and has largely negated the U.S. military advantage in the Western Pacific through two decades of focused military investment,” the report concluded.
One reason is the decline in the share of U.S. resources devoted to the military. This Times chart, which may surprise some readers, tells the story:
Source: Congressional Budget Office | By The New York Times
The report recommended increasing military spending, partly by making changes to Medicare and Social Security (which is sure to upset many liberals) and partly by increasing taxes, including on corporations (which is sure to upset many conservatives). The report also called for more spending on diplomacy and praised the Biden administration for strengthening alliances in Europe and Asia.
A Pentagon bureaucracy that’s too deferential to military suppliers. The report criticized consolidation among defense contractors, which has raised costs and hampered innovation. The future increasingly lies with drones and A.I., not the decades-old equipment that the Pentagon now uses.
A U.S. manufacturing sector that isn’t strong enough to produce what the military needs. A lack of production capacity has already hurt the country’s efforts to aid Ukraine, as The Times has documented. “Putin’s invasion has demonstrated how weak our industrial base is,” David Grannis, the commission’s executive director, said. If the Pentagon and the innovative U.S. technology sector collaborated more, they could address this problem, Grannis added.
A polarized political atmosphere that undermines national unity. A lack of patriotism is one reason that the military has failed to meet its recent recruitment goals. Perhaps more worrisome, many Americans are angry at one another rather than paying attention to external threats.
*******
Where to begin with such nonsense?
So-called “defense” spending currently sits at or above $1 trillion, representing roughly 60% of federal discretionary spending. It continues to rise. Showing it as declining vis-a-vis the GDP is lying through statistics.
Even if military spending was truly declining, which it isn’t, that would be a “good news” story. As President Eisenhower explained in 1953, military spending represents a theft from those who hunger, those who need shelter, those who need better schools and hospitals.
Social Security: Yes, the government is going to keep trying to cut benefits while handing the savings to military contractors. Ditto for Medicare.
Notice who’s mainly to blame for the alleged need for higher military spending: Putin and China.
The Pentagon has misspent funds and misunderstands war. The solution: give the Pentagon more money as a reward.
Americans are allegedly so angry with each other we’re not sufficiently hating Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and other alleged “external threats.”
America lacks patriotism!
All this is reported with a straight face and the utmost seriousness by your “liberal” friends at the New York Times.
So, when your Social Security benefits are reduced, when your Medicare bills go up, as you struggle even more mightily to make ends meet, just know your money is going to the Pentagon and the weapons makers.
Got a problem with that? The real problem just might be your lack of patriotism.
Let's see now ...
After 48 years "in harness," I took an early retirement at 62 instead of waiting until I turned 66. A "quality of life" decision for which I continue to be penalized 25% of my annual Social Security benefits.
For the three years immediately following that move, I was without Medicare, simply because I couldn't afford it. I already had some "pre-existing conditions" - always a red flag for any healthcare - but to get all the necessary coverages I would have had to downgrade my already rather Spartan existence (I'm a man of few material needs: books, pistachio-almond ice cream, Twinings English Breakfast tea, some DVDs, safe & clean accommodations, a tall ship and a star to steer her by ...) to the subsistence level, including taking up residence in some far-less-than-acceptable senior citizen/po' folks/dump. Or perhaps living in my car, which was at least paid for. Of course, I could always go back to work, which would sort of defeat the purpose of retirement (especially as I would have to repay the benefits I'd already received). Something had to give, so I did without both Medicare and the joke known as Medicaid. So, there's another "quality of life" decision.
These things led to my making the largest "quality of life" decision of all: saying goodbye to Amerika. The other contributing factor was the deteriorating social and political climate which continues to this day with encouragement from politicians of all stripes and their corporate sponsors and - most upsetting of all - the increasing violence, racism, willful ignorance, and intolerance for any and all differences of opinion, lifestyle, or thought among the populace.
So, what's left to take away? My citizenship? If I had to fill out a form stating my views on the military, Congress, the US heath care industry, the emphasis on "foreign policy" over domestic issues, the continued assaults on the Constitution, the highly partisan Supreme Court, and where "on a scale of one to ten" I'd rank my level of patriotism and pride in the Amerikan enterprise ... yeah, they just might yank my passport, strike me from the roll of true patriots. Again, what else is left?
These articles from the MSM always carry the same neocon message - we need to spend more on war preparation because we are in charge of the world - Israel told us we are (with their help, of course.)
At same time, no one ever asks how we can go to war with China as it supplies many of our consumer products and a good percentage of our iPhones. The short answer is, we can't - but building up for that war makes a lot of people very rich.