Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fireman1110's avatar

While I like the Analogy "Biden 2.0" I much prefer Biden 3.2 as in the Beer Alcohol Quotient served at my old Airman Clubs in San Antonio, Tx. Circa. 1973. You had to Consume @ least a 6-Pack to even get a minor Buzz!!! As I'm sure, and presume this Lightweight is as well... I much favor the 5% quotient of ethanol!

Expand full comment
Roger Hoffmann's avatar

Your thoughts about Phillips parallel mine, Bill. A few months ago I was thinking that the establishment's thought-leaders were possibly preparing Newsom for the Plan B role should Biden's stumbles be too collectively debilitating to the D's Presidential aspirations. But It's become more recently clear that at least a fair part of the Dem establishment (and their mouthpieces) may be positioning Phillips for the 11th-hour switcheroo. In addition to articles you cited, I saw this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63654388 . He's automatically given top billing. Pretty obvious, that.

He might be a good sell with those partisans for whom it's good news that he just wants to carry on BIden's policies- in a younger, less embarrassing fashion. After all, Biden's growing cognitive decline is pretty much the only reason most of them would like to see someone else run. The mass of the partisans seem not to have any real concern about policies- as long as we're all induced to stating preferred pronouns and the gender dysphoric among the young can get free "gender affirming" services. (I know... this is a pretty narrow view of the Party today but it does seem to be the lowest common denominator. I don't see any evidence of a common undercurrent of economic justice domestically, nor certainly, one of peace, international cooperation and anti-imperialism in foreign policy.)

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?