68 Comments
User's avatar
jg moebus's avatar

Israel gets what it wants, Bill, because Israel wants exactly what America’s MICIMATTT wants. That’s why it exists.

Since its conception, inception, and creation, Israel is now and has ever been a Strategic and Tactical Forward Operational Base for First the British and then the American Empires’ military, economic, and political interests [as in domination] in that part of the world with all its fossil fuel and other natural resources; and its strategic and tactical geographic proximity to, first, the Russian Empire, and then the USSR, and now Russia.

In other words, that “quest for regional dominance” is not Israel’s, but America’s.

And of course, Washington is claiming that it had nothing to do with Israel’s attack on Iran. Just like it claimed that it knew nothing about Ukraine’s drone attack on Russian airfields. Anybody who actually believes that deserves to have Trump as their President and the future for this Nation that that portends.

And Iran has been in America’s crosshairs since long before 2003 and all those “Real Men” who wanted to go to Tehran rather than Baghdad. Like since 1979 when The Shah was run off his throne. We started that by bankrolling Saddam’s War with Iran shortly thereafter, and have been waging a protracted conflict with it ever since. It looks like the new generation of America’s “Real Men” will get a chance to fulfill that 2003 vision. And will no doubt fail.

In any event, this is shaping up to be one of the most interesting Friday the 13th Weekends in a long, long time.

First, on Friday Israel may have, for all intents and purposes, very effectively started World War III. And second, Saturday features POTUS Maxximmuss XLVII’s Birthday Parade, and some 1800 planned “NO KINGS” protests nationwide against his Parade, his Rule, and him.

One can only guess what it will take to give America’s Ruling Political Caste’s boy “Corporal Bonespurs” what he needs to declare some sort of a “National Emergency” and impose Martial Law.

An interesting F-13 Weekend, in deed and indeed.

Expand full comment
John R Moffett's avatar

If you watch Brian Berletic's show, then you already know about the Brookings Institute report from 2009 detailing how the US and Israel were going to attack Iran.

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_iran_strategy.pdf

The US and Israel are following this playbook precisely.

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Thanks JG... Weren't those ChickenHawk 'Real-Men' NeoCon Zionists in 2001? Didn't they write 'Project For A New American Century' in the late '90s sponsored by Netanyahu? AIPAC, the Israel Firsters do not have the Vast Majority of Americans Interest 1st...

Expand full comment
Aunty Jean's avatar

This just sickens me. My husband puts on the local news in the early morning while getting ready for work. I cringe as I try to block out the skewed reporting, as Israel is always defended and Iran is always presented as maniacally evil. Here is how the local news station reported this story: "Iran launches drone strike on Israel; Israel on high alert", then on to the next story with no mention that Israel bombed Iran first.

Expand full comment
TomR's avatar
Jun 13Edited

That Lindsey Graham and those war mongers continue to be re-elected says as much about the voters as them - where are the America First protests? That this is the week that Trump dispatched the ICE goon squads to blue cities is just a coincidence, right?

The Israeli strike was incapable of destroying the deep facilities where the centrifuges are located- they don't have the ordnance or the delivery platforms. Surface labs and individuals were the targets. So was this attack intended to provoke a knee-jerk reaction from Iran, which would draw in the U.S. (Netanyahu's goal)?

The Iranians are more sophisticated than that - and are likely in consultation with China and Russia. My bet is a devastating attack on the Israeli bases where the F-35s are based.

Then it's up to Israel to escalate, which they likely will. Beyond that, all bets are off.

(Added: Jeff Sachs said he heard reports from inside Israel that the attacks were from drones smuggled into Iran. This means Mossad, CIA, and likely the Ukrainian SBU. We are ruled by monsters.)

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Thanks TomR.... It has been Publicly said for Years by various Luminaries, that Israel wanted to launch a first Strike against Iran, and then have the USA perform follow-on Strikes... For Netanyahu, the timing is Good... Netanyahu's Governing Coalition is Weakening, DJT's Coalition is Weakening, Domestic Peace in the USA is unraveling., and International support for Israel is being severely weakened by Netanyahu's Ethnic Extermination in Gaza...

Expand full comment
Ray Joseph Cormier's avatar

No matter the US Propaganda spin, Israel did not attack Iran in 'self defence" but in aggressive Acts of WAR against Iran.

No matter how much the US says it had nothing to do with Israel's attack, just the fact the US will defend Israel against Iran's legitimate retaliation according to International Law, is EVIDENCE the US is totally complicit with Israel leading the US West further down the Path to Armageddon in the Middle East, where Bible History started and by the leading indicators, could END in our Generations.

But more subjectively, this Israeli Military escalation in the oil rich Middle East without which, the GLOBAL ECONOMY would COLLAPSE, has turned Carney's hopes and desires for the G7 starting Sunday to focus only on Economic issues upside-down.

In the context of the last paragraph in this email letter I sent Prime Minister Carney Tuesday, in retrospect, it appears Israel's intrusion was "preemptive!"

MORAL BACKBONE OR LACK THEREOF

To: mark carney; pm@pm.gc.ca; Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca; Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca;

06/10/2025 11:52

Prime Minister Carney,

Know this, so there can be no doubt in the PMO: Since Pierre Trudeau quit in 1984 moving to The Cormier House in Montreal, I had no Spiritual Impulse to speak to Turner, Mulroney, Campbell, Chrétien, Martin, Harper, or Justin Trudeau.

I laid low—until God called me to confront you. You are now like Jonah in belly of the whale having no place left to run and hide from Almighty God. When Jonah came to his senses and did God's will going to Nineveh to warn they were on the Path to Destruction, from the king on down, the people repented and Nineveh was not destroyed.

That was until the Year of the Lord 2014, when that Biblical History repeated itself. ISIS blew up the Islamic Mosque in Nineveh, Iraq, containing the Tomb of Jonah in the whale fame from the Jewish-Christian tradition. That was the same Year of the Lord when the US-CIA orchestrated the regime change of the Democratically elected, Russian friendly Ukraine government, installing an anti-Russian Ukraine government which immediately started shelling the Russian-speaking Ukrainians bordering Russia.

This is the strong Spiritual impulse God gave me to impress on you Today because obviously, you have eyes but do not see: So you, O son of man, I have set you a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore you shall hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me. If the watchman see the sword come, and doesn't blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand. In our Times, it's the house of CanaDa & Israel.

From the 1st contact letter I sent to you March 16 with Birthday wishes, congratulations and a Vision for CanaDa, no one in the PMO recognized the Good Will. Even the Easter Sunday letter had Good Will toward you, though I gave you the ultimatum if you do not publicly condemn Israel's genocide in Gaza by April 28, instead of the super majority the polls said you would get up to Easter Sunday, you would have a minority and so it is.

NO ONE in the PMO followed this link to https://rayjc.com/2025/03/13/pierre-trudeau-the-year-of-three-popes-and-the-divine-shaking-of-earthly-powers/ The PMO can dismiss it but cannot change the historical FACTS. The PMO may not believe me, but do you believe your own RCMP Security? This is the official RCMP account of the Face to Face Time and Chance encounter with Pierre Trudeau late at night on August 3, 1978.

Image from this link embedded in the letter: https://rayjc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rcmp-1.jpg

Naturally, the RCMP Agent would not recognize I was speaking by the Christ Spirit, the very words Christ Jesus said to Peter the 1st Pope, recorded in John 21. It makes perfect sense! While I spoke those words in my Faith of that Day called TODAY, I had no foreknowledge, Pope Paul VI would DIE 3 days later.

This is the official RCMP report from October 13, 1978, embedded in the article linked above, as the Christ Spirit moved me to prophesy the 3rd command in the sequence from John 21. In the media melee at the front door to Glebe, I said, "Prime Minister! Look at the Spirit of the 13. Feed the lambs!" as he went to speak to the children.

Image from this link embedded in the letter: https://rayjc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/scan-1.jpg

NOTE: the RCMP Agent put "13" in quotes. With the election 3 days later, Trudeau lost "13" of the 15 by-elections, and the unscheduled election of Pope John Paul II was announced. These are undeniable Historical Facts!

Prime Minister, in your Declaration with England & France so long ago this is what you said: “We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response. We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.  We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions."

Netanyahu is giving you the finger Mark Carney, continuing to do everything the statement condemns and obviously those high - sounding ideals were just Political spin. Where's your MORAL BACKBONE?

You are complicit sacrificing the lives of Palestinian Children and Woman to preserve caucus support in your minority Parliament by a minority of MPs in a Faustian bargain with the Devil.

Why should anyone believe you will back up your own words when you let Netanyahu give you the finger on such a fundamental Issue of Truth and Justice and our Common Humanity in this Common Era of Christ?

I know you are anxious to host the G7 and mingle with the privileged and powerful elites already opting for Destruction deciding on escalation of the European WAR in this Nuclear Missile Age. I am also anxious to see what comes of it? When the G8 met in Muskoka in 2010 attended by all those thinking of themselves as the movers and shakers in this World, Almighty God showed them who the real mover and shaker is with an Earthquake and a Tornado, totally unusual for that area.

When I commended you for your joint statement with England and France May 21 starting my 82nd year, this was the condition with the question mark: Finally, Publicly recognizing the horrific Israeli Genocide in Gaza. Better late than never! Now I hope your minority government lasts a while?

That is only my personal hope Prime Minister. Depending on what comes out of the G7, by God, your tenure as Prime Minister may not last much longer than Kim Cambell's. God is that powerful!

PEACE

Ray Joseph Cormier

RayJC

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Hello Ray... Israel attacked Iran to extend Netanyahu's Political Survival.... Netanyahu has been 'Railing' against Iran since the mid-90s... Netanyahu has rode the Chimera of Iran into Power Since....

Expand full comment
Glen Brown's avatar

Early Christian Judean History. The New Testament. Christians could borrow but could not lend. That distinction allowed Jews to become bankers (they were excluded from many other activities in Christian neighborhoods) in a period of expanding commerce that required moneylenders. Therefore, the REALITY of the importance of money to Jews. That's not anti-Semitism that's reality not spoken out loud in polite company. Today Israel-The Israeli lobby-organized money/power leads America and has led America into several wars. Mearsheimer author of the Israeli Lobby, today points out that the Israeli Lobby is the most destructive force in America behind America's warring. Israel's interests in fact go against the interests of America and indeed in the interests of there ever being world peace. Caitlin Johnstone is correct the creation of the State of Israel went against the interests of humanity.

Expand full comment
Glen Brown's avatar

It's safe to talk about the wealth/power- the evils of the Israeli Lobby. It's far less safe to dare to point out the highly disproportionate the number of the extremely wealthy of Billionaires are Jews. How dare I !

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Hello Glen... That includes the Legal, the Financial, Entertainment, and Medical Industries... I could say more, but as you say, it is not P.C. ... Let's just hope that not too many innocents suffer...

Expand full comment
Glen Brown's avatar

Jews where excluded from other activities... for centuries I might have added. The external rewards open to them in the more finacialized industries...other rewards were denied. Has nothing to do with race but how we reward and exclude peoples from rewards...how we limit rewards and how limiting our reward systems are. Muslims and indigenous peoples had entirely different reward systems. Material growth- making money off of money was to say the least a far lessor focus.

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

That was true during past times... But not now... Contemporary Israel a large imported Laborer Population like USA Agriculture, or the Gulf States...

Expand full comment
Glen Brown's avatar

Contemporary Israel has taken complete advantage of the reward system that made America a great power that made European great powers before America. America and the West made Israel.

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Hello Glen... The USA , and the Europeans, can Exist without Israel.... Can Israel exist without American, or European Subsidies?

Expand full comment
musicbob's avatar

Excellent article. Thanks for writing this, which needed to be written.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

YES, it is. If I were trying to get elected to get it to stop, I would want to figure out how to get the votes, and it would not be easy in the world of distrust that Trump has fostered with his Goebbels-type propaganda and “Fake News” carrying on. Nobody trusts nobody these days. Trying to “win” those votes DID require nuance. She didn’t manage to do it. He didn’t, either {he got fewer votes than a majority}, but some votes went to others that could have kept him out of the White House. I still think that was job one … NOT to have a Trump presidency this time around. All other decency was at stake, and we blew it.

Expand full comment
wrknight's avatar

It galls my ass that those who advocate for war have never, and will never, don

a uniform or pick up a weapon to fight for their country.

Expand full comment
Fireman1110's avatar

"Don" DJT No pun intended?

Expand full comment
Fireman1110's avatar

Don't forget Kids we have a Bigly Military Parade in Washington D.C. tomorrow!!! Trumps Mil. Parade...:/ :o)

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Horrid, horrid, horrid, and frightening beyond measure.

I have a serious coupla questions here .. Do we think Kamala Harris would have sat silent, as Trump does, watching the razing of Gaza that has ramped up since the new administration arrived and started talking about moving Palestinians out and creating a beach resort there? Do we recognize that we HAD a treaty with Iran to prevent nuclear weapons development, and the current president is the one who trashed that? Do we think Netanyahu would have bombed Iran in this manner, if we had a Democratic administration and Congress, instead of a lunatic in the White House? Would there have been SOME effort from over here to rein in Bibi’s monstrosity?

Maybe. I’m just asking.

Expand full comment
Bill Astore's avatar

With respect to Kamala and the Democrats, who knows? Harris was also a big supporter of Israel.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

She was not as ‘one note’ about it, though. And I think a lot of people made mistakes about voting demographics in this country last fall, pulling punches when they should have been more verbal about world issues.

She actually said out loud she supported justice and decency for Palestinians, and I remember hearing the words “two states,” but I’d have to look that up to confirm.

BUT, strategically, I see her CONSTITUENCY as being far more supportive of a decent resolution to the Palestinians plight than anyone anywhere in the Republican camp.

That CONSTITUENCY would have had more power to move the US policy in a better direction.

I’m speaking about reality and strategic vision here, and I think the entire world had a better chance at stability, if we did not put Trump in the White House.

But we had to choose what was possible, not pie in the sky. Kamala was possible.

And we might have pushed what was possible in the directions we hoped to make them move … What we got was heels digging in and Trump.

Sh*t!!!

Along some of the worst bombing in Gaza since Trump came in and all the holds were loosed, and an emboldened Putin, Marines in Los Angeles, and a huge military parade digging up the streets in Washington this weekend.

Yay. That’s what NOT being strategic has gotten us.

Expand full comment
Aunty Jean's avatar

The Democrats have supported every war we have been in for decades now, and Harris is very pro-Israel. "Harris this year [during DNC convention] seemed far more interested in boasting about the US’s “lethal” military and campaigning alongside the torture advocate Liz Cheney (while also touting the endorsement of her father, the “war on terror” architect Dick Cheney) than in articulating a vision of peace and stability." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/jan/09/democrats-war-foreign-policy

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

The Democrats have been jerks on many occasions. And they’ve brought other good policies to the table, too. They still are the only side that held possibility for mitigation and change for the better. Both-sides-ing the Dems and Repubs is just stupid. Stop it.

Expand full comment
Aunty Jean's avatar

If you feel the need call me "stupid", it seems that my words have struck a nerve. A reasoned argument on your behalf, with citations to back up your judgments would imply that you feel secure in your thinking.

Expand full comment
John R Moffett's avatar

Agree with you Jean. The Dems use different words as they commit genocide and wage war across the globe, anyone who thinks they are better must be watching the propaganda shows masquerading as news.

Expand full comment
Aunty Jean's avatar

Amen to that

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

I didn’t call you “stupid.” I called “both-sides-ing” the Dems and Repubs stupid. It’s a narrow statement on my part, aimed at behavior. I don’t for a moment think smart and capable people are unable to do or say stupid things on occasion. And “both-sides-ing” Dems and Repubs absolutely DOES strike a nerve, so you’re dead straight there …. Stop it. Republicans are FAR to the side of fascism, and some Dems might be, but most of them aren’t, especially the rank-and-file, if not high mucky mucks. {I am a Bernie, supporter, for the record, and have met him, and some members of my family are on a first-name basis with him.}

As for whether Kamala MIGHT have been reachable or able to be influenced, she mighta been … I can’t say what would have happened, as I don’t have magic or a crystal ball, but she was far from Trump, and what we got was Trump.

I am saying, if we had been more STRATEGIC {I think people with a military leadership background have been taught to think strategically — correct me, if I’m wrong}, we might have had someone able to listen to reason, instead of the MAGAts and Trumpistas, who live in a fascist fantasy land.

And, citations? Ohhhhh, OK! Here. This does not say she was where I wanted her to be — just that she had more of a chance of hearing reason than The Giant Orange One does:

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/23/g-s1-19232/kamala-harris-israel-gaza-dnc

Expand full comment
Bill Astore's avatar

It's the responsibility of political candidates to win votes. That's what a campaign is for. Harris lost. She simply didn't run an effective campaign.

It's not the responsibility of voters "to think strategically" and to vote for candidates that they find unconvincing, off-putting, uninspiring, dishonest, and so on.

We simply don't know what President Harris would have done, but, judging by her words and actions, she likely would have deferred to and defended Israel no matter what. After all, can you stoop much lower than defending Israel's genocide in Gaza?

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

NO, defending Bibi’s abhorrent razing of Gaza, and excusing it with lie after lie about going after Hamas … that is indefensible. Kamala stayed too far on the Bibi side of that line, but she did say justice and decency for Gazans needed to be an aim, as well.

Remember, it has gotten MUCH worse under Trump, and now we’re seeing Iran dragged even deeper in. That is a result of Trump in the White House. A consequence of Trump.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Actually, Bill, that is the kind of thinking I find problematical … purist and letting voters off the hook. If you don’t think being strategic is ALWAYS an important aspect of choosing a path toward the future, when dealing with politics, then I wonder when you think strategy IS appropriate? And why is it not ALWAYS appropriate to know the possible or probable consequences of what you are deciding to do and why you are deciding to do it? {Knowing your strategy, in other words…}

Disclaiming strategic thinking, especially in the world we are in, strikes me as EXCEEDINGLY short-sighted. Politicians DO need to “win” votes — and voters need to own the decisions they’ve made, too, in light of clear and present indications about what the consequences of their votes will likely be.

I have ideals, too. And I try to be strategic in my approach to ensuring that they will find their way into our world … rather than merely “believing” in them, but abdicating responsibility to conduct a valid struggle to actualize them.

Expand full comment
Aunty Jean's avatar

I read that article from NPR. Here's another one from NPR on the Palestinian issue: https://www.npr.org/2024/08/24/nx-s1-5086924/the-dnc-didnt-let-a-palestinian-american-speak-the-uncommitted-movement-took-note If Kamala truly believed in dignity for Palestinians, she would have let the Palestinian movement speak.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

I was aware of that, too. If she truly had full control, who knows what she’d have done... If she weren’t balancing thousands of balls in the air, and if Palestinians weren’t being used as pawns on the international chessboard … Palestinians did {and do} need their voice, and I was appalled that they were denied … and I’m appalled at what has been visited there in Gaza and the West Bank since Trump took over, even more. We needed to stop that man, and we didn’t. She would have had serious flaws. She would not have been Trump, someone we MIGHT be incapable of surviving …

Expand full comment
TomR's avatar

I believe it's too easy to say this or that politician would do something differently. Politicians, including Trump, are not independent actors - they are surrounded by deep forces and structures around them who drive their decision making.

In the case of Harris, hypothetical though it would be, who would have been her advisors?

First, in her cabinet, she would likely have continued with many of the Zionist holdovers from Biden (he would have insisted). The brevity of her campaign would not have given time to consider others.

Second, her backers in the Senate would have included Chuck Schumer - who has vowed to ensure the Democrats remain pro-Israel. She would be made to look independent, but she'd take her orders from the murderous Netanyahu like everyone else.

She had a chance to demonstrate her independence in her campaign - even though Biden had ordered 'not one inch difference'. If she would have come out and said Gaza is a genocide and she would stop it, arguments to her independence would carry more weight.

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Hello TomR.... I agree with your 'RealPolitik' assessment...

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

She needed to TRY to get elected with a huge separation between rigid supporters of Palestinians and Israel — She didn’t have enough time to carve out a nuanced and decent position … I see and understand that failure …. I wish Biden has left sooner, for sure. But I wonder if the prisoner swap, which came on the very day he stepped down, had anything to do with his timing. No one has asked him that, so far as I know, but the timing was pretty “coincidental.”

I’d actually vote for a LOT of other Dems, if I only had the chance … Very progressive ones.

MY MAIN ARGUMENT is that the Left was far to absolutist and not at all strategic in November, and that got us Trump — SURE, lots of elements contributed to how it went, but a strategic, rather than trenchant, Left was missing from the fray.

Expand full comment
TomR's avatar

I'm sorry but there can be no nuanced position regarding genocide. It is a moral question - not political.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Yes, it was and is. And yet, people can’t seem to agree on what it is…It is what is happening in Gaza…Also, ethnic cleansing. And war crimes. All of that. Worse, since we let Trump get elected.

Expand full comment
Velociraver's avatar

Absolutely not, both parties are beholden to Israel and Kamala was just as vapid as Trump.

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Nope. She and Democrats always say “Israel has a right to defend itself” [which, as a country it does, but that doesn’t mean “a right to do anything it damned well feels like”}, and we supplied way too much armament there, during some of the worst of the first bombing, but she was the one who had SOME possibility of being moved in her position to be less of a Bibi rubber stamp than Trump.

Trump is a total lost cause and a tyrant-wannabe. Look at how he’s behaving today about attacking Iran!

Letting him back in office has been a mistake of EPIC proportions {to go down in history as world changing…and not for the better, if we even survive the climate change, and his thinking the US has no restrictions on its behavior in the world}.

Expand full comment
Apache's avatar

Hello Pat... Don't forget that Kamala ran a very brief, forgettable campaign in '20... Watch the unedited CBS Interview that DJT is suing about... Kamala is not Strong, or Decisive, in Impromptu Situations...

Expand full comment
Pat Goudey OBrien's avatar

Sigh! Telegenic .. Part of our cult of personality and celebrity. Sigh.

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCroskey's avatar

Here's the story. This is the opening of the second front against Russia. Russia has said it will back Iran. Russia is in the middle of preparing a proper response to the attacks by Ukraine drones. The PM of the Zionist entity is in danger of his coalition govt collapsing. He has always wanted to attack Iran. So the stars align and it's a perfect window for their attack. Bibi gets more "war-president" status to hold the coalition together. Hopefully Iran can get the necessary job done. Welcome to WW-III!

Expand full comment
Jazzme's avatar

So the world waits for Iran's response. Will Iran have allies in its response. Leaders of the world will be pondering: do nothing stay neutral or pick a side joining the BRICS or the USA and friends. As an American my hope is for a multi polar world not one dominated by our evil empire monopolar ambition. My thoughts and wishes are that the world puts Isreal and the USA in its proper place in a multi polar world. I am no supporter of Isreal's madness or that of the USA equal madness of genocide.

Expand full comment
Velociraver's avatar

Nobody will miss Israel or USA. I hope your next civil war is bloodier than the last one, it will make for entertaining television here.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 13Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ray Joseph Cormier's avatar

Both Israel & the US are joined at the hip, thinking God has given them a Divine Mandate to conform the World in their images.

The Israeli Star of David is on the back of EVERY US dollar in the Stars above the US Eagle. On the front of every US dollar and on the Lincoln penny are the explicit words, IN GOD WE TRUST.

Since the end of WWII, the US dollar was like god, I see as 'the image of the beast' in the Revelation of Jesus Christ the Jew in these last days.

Expand full comment