Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John R Moffett's avatar

There are so many laws on the books because they are the toolkit that those in power use as needed against perceived enemies. Trump got busted in a Blue Team state, and if the same trial had been held in Texas he would have been acquitted. Sufficient scrutiny of any wealthy person in the country would reveal illegalities, but that almost never happens to people with lots of money and good lawyers unless they cross other, richer people. It is not a justice system, it is a system of selective prosecution. Ask the peaceful protesters who got thrown in jail recently.

Both candidates are a blight on humanity, and either one will exacerbate the ongoing disasters. But since the initial selection process for candidates is out of the hands of voters, we are only going to get horrible choices (a choice between Cholera or Gonorrhea, in Julian Assange's words).

Expand full comment
TomR's avatar

It's difficult to care at this point - the decision was inevitable from the outset. Likely the same as the inevitable appeal based on trial irregularities, the court's instruction to the jury, and so on. The goal of getting a conviction is both for the campaign season and for stopping him, if elected, via the 14th amendment - no matter the decision inevitably overturned on an appeal (delayed until after January 2024).

What I am concerned about is the international response to this circus. The U.S. has now shown itself capable of seizing foreign assets held in U.S. banks, supporting genocide, and now using its legal system against its political opponents. We are a rogue nation - and a foreign leader (e.g., Putin, Xi), in a moment of grave crisis, could not and would not believe anything a US diplomat or president told them. That is terrifying.

Expand full comment
62 more comments...

No posts