What Do Leading Democrats Believe In?
Israel, Definitely, and Getting Paid, But What Else?
Five years ago in April 2019, I posted this article. Clearly, the Democrats (and Republicans) believe in Israel. They believe in getting paid (as Mike Murry commented back in 2019; see this recent article by Lee Fang, for example). I don’t think anything has changed (except a couple of faces) in the Democratic Party. Readers, what do you think?
(Sadly, Bernie Sanders chose to bend the knee to the DNC and the Party; perhaps his wife was threatened with prosecution for her role in mismanaging money while she was a college president.)
Give me five minutes, and I can tell you exactly what Bernie Sanders believes in. Single-payer health care for all. A $15 minimum wage. Higher taxes on the richest Americans. College education that doesn’t bankrupt families and leave students with crushing debt. Criminal justice reform. Investment in infrastructure and renewable energy. He gives specifics, and he’s walked a principled walk for decades.
But what does the Democratic Partly leadership believe in? As this article at Truthdig put it, “Nancy Pelosi Believes In Nothing.” Of course, she does believe in something: her own power and privilege, which she seeks to maintain and expand. But principles like those held by Bernie Sanders? Forget about it.
I’ve been reading Matt Taibbi’s “The Great Derangement,” a terrific book that came out in 2008, and Taibbi nails it in this passage (pages 243-4):
The Democrats’ error was in believing that people wouldn’t notice this basic truth [that the party’s ideology is driven by power and nothing more] about their priorities. They were wrong on that score. In fact, a Quinnipiac poll taken around that time [2007] found the approval rating of Congress had fallen to 23 percent. Other polls saw the number plummet to the teens. The rating of the Democratic Congress was even lower than [George W.] Bush’s, and it was not hard to see why. Bush was wrong and insane, but he stood for something. It was a fucked-up something, but it was something. The Democrats stood for nothing; they viewed their own constituents as problems to be handled, and even casual voters were beginning to see this.
If you substitute Trump’s name for Bush’s in the above quotation, it makes even more sense. “[Trump] was wrong and insane, but he stood for something. It was a fucked-up something, but it was something.”
This is the biggest issue for corporate Democrats: What do you stand for? For so many in the establishment, what they stand for is themselves. The perpetuation of their own power and privilege. This is the biggest reason why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016. It was always all about her.
Another quotation from Matt Taibbi made me laugh out loud even as I winced at the harsh truth of it (page 190):
You don’t elect politicians to commit crimes; you elect politicians to make your crimes legal. That is the whole purpose of the racket of government.
In this case, the “you” in question are all the banks, corporations, and other vested interests that essentially buy our politicians. Until we get big money out of politics, this corruption will persist.
Bernie Sanders doesn’t take corporate money. Neither does Tulsi Gabbard. But most of the current batch of Democratic candidates for president in 2020 do take money from big corporate and financial donors. And that should tell you what they believe in: their own power and privilege, and little else.
Speaking of Bernie Sanders, I recently read a depressing article in the Nation by Eric Alterman who argued Bernie can’t win in 2020. Why? Supposedly because Americans won’t elect a socialist, and also because Trump and the Republican attack machine will convince Americans he’s simply too radical.
WTF? Americans are desperate for leaders who believe in something rather than nothing. That’s why Trump won in 2016. Again, in the spirit of Taibbi, Trump may be batshit crazy, but he does take a stand, e.g. “Build the wall.” The best way to defeat Trump in 2020 is to go bold: to nominate a candidate with strong core beliefs. A candidate who connects with young and old and who inspires enthusiastic participation. That’s Bernie.
But perhaps Jimmy Dore, the comedian/political commentator, is right: establishment Democrats like Pelosi would rather defeat Progressives like Bernie Sanders than win the presidential election against Trump in 2020. Because if Trump wins, they can continue to serve (and profit from) corporate interests while posing as being anti-Trump, i.e. they can continue life as they know it, with all the power and privilege that comes with it.
As my wife quipped today, “They don’t let their beliefs get in their way, do they?” Which is another way of saying they really have no beliefs at all.
Isn't it something how issues take a back seat to words such as SOCIALIST (in caps because it gets attention as if it were always in caps). Some may recall how Nixon's appearance supposedly killed his chances against JFK.
It hasn't always been this way. In the Lincoln-Douglas debates lots of humor was based on the giant vs pygmy appearance of the two but people all over Illinois listened for hours to what the two men had to say, eager to hear the points being made and the counter arguments to each point. The text of these debates is available. It's worth reading just one of them to see how far things have fallen in the public political arena. Today, not only would any politician lack the facility with the English language of those times, but the audience would be quickly bored and constantly checking smartphones.
It seems to me we have become incapacitated. Most people have trouble speaking clearly, writing is a shadow of what it was, attention spans are short, patience is rare and the very pace of daily activity leaves no time for even five minutes of engaged thinking. And at all times we are deluged with advertising, piped in music everywhere and all of it unrelated to what we are doing at the moment. Is it any wonder stress is rampant - yet people seek caffeine laced drinks and uppers claiming it helps them think! From Lincoln's time to now we have steadily wandered off the road of thought and into the weeds of confusion. Stimulation we see/hear everywhere, clear thinking and the time to engage in it, nowhere.
In our desperate hyperactivity, we simplify and attend to a word like SOCIALIST to settle our views for or against someone. The tragedy of our times is that nobody, if asked to speak about the future either short or long term, would say that things will slow down. Who wants this? We are out of control of our own future.
Lincoln and Douglas, Trump and Biden. Progress?
The reason that I am not sad about Bernie being shut out by the Democratic Party is that there is no doubt in my mind that he would have soon been ASSASSINATED by those GREEDY & POWER HUNGRY fools. The only thing worse that the Republican Party is.... the Democratic Party.
WE have government BY corporations, OF Corporations and FOR Corporations.
Until we can DUMP "Citizens United" and work for more public funding of elections, things will never change